Key result
Local impedance-guided ablation is linked to ~43% shorter ablation times versus conventional or contact force guidance.
Why the study?
Local impedance-guided ablation for assessing lesion effectiveness in cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter, along with ultra-high density mapping for ablation line breakthrough, had not previously been assessed.
Does local impedance-guided ablation reduce ablation time and improve lesion effectiveness compared to conventional or contact force-guided ablation in patients with CTI-dependent atrial flutter?
Observational (n=30)
No
Does local impedance-guided ablation reduce ablation time and improve lesion effectiveness compared to conventional or contact force-guided ablation in patients with CTI-dependent atrial flutter?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.2% vs 5.6%
p-value: p=0.0042
Local impedance-guided ablation for CTI-dependent atrial flutter significantly reduces total ablation time and mean lesion duration compared to conventional and contact force-guided methods, with comparable procedural success.
May shorten ablation times in CTI flutter; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
INTRODUCTION: - Local impedance (LI) guided ablation as a method of judging lesion effectiveness for cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter (CTI-AFL), and ultra-high density (UHD) mapping when breakthrough occurred across an ablation line has not previously been assessed. METHODS: This retrospective observational study evaluated patients undergoing CTI-AFL ablation using conventional, contact force (CF) and LI guided strategies. Ablation metrics were collected, and in the LI cohort, the use of UHD mapping for breakthrough evaluated. RESULTS: 30 patients were included, 10 per group. Mean total ablation time was significantly shorter with LI (3.2 ± 1.3min) vs conventional (5.6 ± 2.7min) and CF (5.7 ± 2.0min, p = 0.0042). Time from start of ablation to CTI block was numerically shorter with LI (14.2 ± 8.0min) vs conventional and CF (19.7 ± 14.1 and 22.5 ± 19.1min, p = 0.4408). Mean lesion duration was significantly shorter with LI, but there were no differences in the number of lesions required to achieve block, procedural success, complication rates or recurrence. 15/30 patients did not achieve block following first-pass ablation. UHD mapping rapidly identified breakthrough in the five LI patients, including epicardial-endocardial breakthrough (EEB). CONCLUSION: - The use of LI during ablation for real-time lesion assessment was as efficacious as the conventional and CF methods. UHD mapping rapidly identified breakthrough, including EEB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saraf et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter (n=30). Local impedance-guided ablation vs. Conventional or contact force-guided ablation was evaluated on Mean total ablation time (minutes) (p=0.0042). Local impedance-guided ablation significantly reduced mean total ablation time to 3.2 minutes compared to 5.6 minutes for conventional and 5.7 minutes for contact force-guided ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: