Key result
Non-complete procedural success after ventricular tachycardia ablation in nonischemic cardiomyopathy was a strong predictor of VT recurrence (HR 8.20; 95% CI 2.37-28.43; P=0.001).
Why the study?
What are the outcomes and predictors of VT recurrence after ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy?
Population
45 patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy accepted for ventricular tachycardia ablation, mean age 60±16…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
25±15 months
Authors
Loading...
Supports targeting complete noninducibility during NICM VT ablation; leaves open randomized validation of procedural endpoints.
Cohort (n=45)
What are the outcomes and predictors of VT recurrence after ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy?
Effect estimate: HR 8.20 (95% CI 2.37-28.43)
p-value: p=0.001
In patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing VT ablation, complete procedural success (noninducibility of any monomorphic VT) is associated with low recurrence rates, whereas partial success or failure strongly predicts VT recurrence.
Piers et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Nonischemic cardiomyopathy with ventricular tachycardia (n=45). Ventricular tachycardia ablation vs. Complete procedural success vs. non-complete success was evaluated on Ventricular tachycardia recurrence (HR 8.20, 95% CI 2.37-28.43, p=0.001). Non-complete procedural success after ventricular tachycardia ablation in nonischemic cardiomyopathy was a strong predictor of VT recurrence (HR 8.20; 95% CI 2.37-28.43; P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: