Key result
Current medical therapies for recurrent VA remain insufficient due to substandard efficacy and toxicities.
Why the study?
Does medical therapy prevent recurrence of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with and without structural heart disease?
Does medical therapy prevent recurrence of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with and without structural heart disease?
Current medical therapies for preventing recurrent ventricular arrhythmias have substandard efficacy and toxicities, highlighting the need for further drug development and randomized trials.
INTRODUCTION: Recurrent ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are a source of significant morbidity in patients without structural heart disease (SHD) and also mortality in patients with SHD. The treatment goals for these two patient populations differ greatly. Areas covered: The secondary prevention of recurrent VA in patients without and with SHD will be reviewed, focusing on clinical data (especially randomized, controlled trials) in the literature as determined through searches in PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. This will include β blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers and antiarrhythmic drugs in both subgroups and non-antiarrhythmic medications in SHD. Expert commentary: The available options for medical therapy for VA in both normal hearts and SHD are insufficient, due to substandard efficacy and toxicities. While non-pharmacologic therapies may provide an excellent option, further drug development and randomized trials are needed, as is a reappraisal of the current mode of utilization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacobson et al. (2016) conducted a review in Recurrent ventricular arrhythmias in patients with and without structural heart disease. Medical therapy (beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, antiarrhythmic drugs) was evaluated. Current medical therapies for recurrent ventricular arrhythmias in patients with and without structural heart disease are insufficient due to substandard efficacy and toxicities.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: