Key result
Neural network analyzing 12-lead ECGs predicts intermittent AF with 85% sensitivity.
Why the study?
AF etiology in India differs from the West due to high valvular heart disease prevalence, motivating evaluation of a deep learning 12-lead ECG model to screen high-risk populations for AF.
Does a deep learning model applied to 12-lead ECGs during sinus rhythm predict intermittent atrial fibrillation in an Indian population?
Observational (n=3,463)
No
Does a deep learning model applied to 12-lead ECGs during sinus rhythm predict intermittent atrial fibrillation in an Indian population?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.84-0.88
Absolute Event Rate: 85% vs 69%
A deep learning model applied to standard 12-lead ECGs during sinus rhythm can identify patients at risk for intermittent atrial fibrillation with high sensitivity, potentially aiding in early screening.
May support ECG-based AF risk flagging in sinus rhythm; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background: Deep learning (DL) models can discern electrocardiogram (ECG) reports to identify individuals at risk for atrial fibrillation (AF). The etiology of AF in India differs from the West, with a high prevalence of valvular heart disease (mainly rheumatic). This study evaluates a DL model of 12-lead ECG reports comparing normal sinus rhythm with intermittent AF to screen high-risk populations for AF. Methodology: Electronic medical records of 69,700 patients (200,650 ECGs) attending a tertiary cardiac center from December 2010 to October 2024 were searched. The 10s, 12-lead ECGs of patients with intermittent AF (sinus rhythm with documented AF) or normal sinus rhythm (without history of AF or risk factors of AF) were classified with a DL model (3304 records for training, 159 for testing) of one-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN). At a 50% threshold, the model was adjusted for hyperparameters, evaluated for performance, and screened individuals with risk factors such as diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), valvular disease, and ischemic heart disease (IHD). Results: The model generation used 1956 records with normal sinus rhythm and 1507 with intermittent AF. The sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 69% (positive predictive value: 73%, negative predictive value: 82%; AUC: 0.84-0.88). The model assessed risk of AF was: 327/516 in post-IHD, 235/502 in HTN and DM, 137/387 in DM and 499/1040 in HTN, and 902/1398 in valvular disease. Conclusion: The CNN model developed based on the ECG signatures offers 85%–90% sensitivity in screening individuals at risk of developing AF. The prediction could facilitate early intervention to prevent the sudden onset of complications, including stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parale et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Atrial Fibrillation (n=3,463). One-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) was evaluated on Prediction of intermittent atrial fibrillation (AUC 0.84-0.88). A one-dimensional convolutional neural network analyzing 12-lead ECGs predicted intermittent atrial fibrillation with 85% sensitivity, 69% specificity, and an AUC of 0.84-0.88.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: