Key result
Adding Lp(a) to the Suita score significantly improves prediction of high-risk plaque on CCTA.
Why the study?
Does combining Lipoprotein(a) levels with the Suita score improve the prediction of high-risk plaque on CCTA in Japanese patients with suspected coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=272)
Does combining Lipoprotein(a) levels with the Suita score improve the prediction of high-risk plaque on CCTA in Japanese patients with suspected coronary artery disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Combining Lipoprotein(a) levels with the Suita score improves the prediction of high-risk coronary plaques on CCTA in Japanese patients with suspected CAD.
AIMS: The global distribution of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels varies due to racial and ethnic differences. However, the clinical relevance of Lp(a) levels in Japanese patients has not been fully explored. METHODS: We investigated the association of Lp(a) levels, the Suita score, and the presence of high-risk plaque (HRP) as well as that of ≥ 50% stenosis, quantitative plaque volume, and the value of coronary artery calcium score in coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA), among 272 Japanese patients (mean age: 65 years) in whom serum Lp(a) levels were measured due to suspected coronary artery disease. HRP was defined as positive remodeling and/or low attenuation. Plaque volume was quantified as the percent plaque volume. RESULTS: HRP was identified in 33 (12.1%) patients. The prevalence of HRP, ≥ 50% stenosis, and percent plaque volume progressively increased with higher Lp (a) levels and Suita scores. In multivariate analyses, Lp(a) and the Suita score independently predicted HRP when assessed as continuous (p = 0.02, p<0.001, respectively) or categorical variables (p = 0.005, p = 0.007, respectively). Patients in the highest tertile of Lp(a) and classified as high- or intermediate-risk by the Suita score had the highest HRP risk, whereas those in the lower 2 tertiles and low-risk group had the lowest. Incorporating Lp(a) into the Suita score improved the prediction of HRP beyond the Suita score alone (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The combinatorial value of assessing Lp(a) levels and Suita score may provide useful insight regarding Japanese patients undergoing CCTA for the prediction of HRP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niwa et al. (2025) conducted an observational in suspected coronary artery disease (n=272). Lipoprotein(a) levels and Suita score vs. Lower levels/scores was evaluated on Presence of high-risk plaque (HRP) (p=0.005). Higher Lipoprotein(a) levels and Suita scores independently predicted high-risk plaque on CCTA, and incorporating Lp(a) improved prediction beyond the Suita score alone (p=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: