Key result
ICU admission within one week linked to ~877% higher HF mortality in machine learning models.
Why the study?
As heart failure progresses into advanced heart failure, patients experience poor quality of life, intensive care use, and hospital death; this study aimed to investigate the relationship between mortality and potential prognostic factors among in-patient and emergency patients with HF.
Observational (n=3,871)
Yes
Effect estimate: OR 9.765 (95% CI 6.65-14.34)
p-value: p=<0.001
Machine learning models applied to electronic medical records can accurately predict mortality in hospitalized and emergency heart failure patients, highlighting recent ICU admission, age, and respiratory rate as key prognostic factors.
Recent ICU admission associated with HF mortality; hypothesis-generating for ML prediction in EMRs, needs prospective validation.
Purpose: As HF progresses into advanced HF, patients experience a poor quality of life, distressing symptoms, intensive care use, social distress, and eventual hospital death. We aimed to investigate the relationship between morality and potential prognostic factors among in-patient and emergency patients with HF. Patients and Methods: A case series study: Data are collected from in-hospital and emergency care patients from 2014 to 2021, including their international classification of disease at admission, and laboratory data such as blood count, liver and renal functions, lipid profile, and other biochemistry from the hospital's electrical medical records. After a series of data pre-processing in the electronic medical record system, several machine learning models were used to evaluate predictions of HF mortality. The outcomes of those potential risk factors were visualized by different statistical analyses. Results: In total, 3871 hF patients were enrolled. Logistic regression showed that intensive care unit (ICU) history within 1 week (OR: 9.765, 95% CI: 6.65, 14.34; p-value < 0.001) and prothrombin time (OR: 1.193, 95% CI: 1.098, 1.296; <0.001) were associated with mortality. Similar results were obtained when we analyzed the data using Cox regression instead of logistic regression. Random forest, support vector machine (SVM), Adaboost, and logistic regression had better overall performances with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) of >0.87. Naïve Bayes was the best in terms of both specificity and precision. With ensemble learning, age, ICU history within 1 week, and respiratory rate (BF) were the top three compelling risk factors affecting mortality due to HF. To improve the explainability of the AI models, Shapley Additive Explanations methods were also conducted. Conclusion: Exploring HF mortality and its patterns related to clinical risk factors by machine learning models can help physicians make appropriate decisions when monitoring HF patients' health quality in the hospital.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Heart Failure (n=3,871). Intensive care unit (ICU) history within 1 week vs. No ICU history within 1 week was evaluated on Mortality (OR 9.765, 95% CI 6.65-14.34, p=<0.001). Intensive care unit history within 1 week was strongly associated with heart failure mortality (OR 9.765), and machine learning models like Random Forest achieved high predictive performance (AUROC 0.898).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: