Key result
Radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablation yield similar quality of life improvements for paroxysmal AF.
Why the study?
This study was conducted to compare quality-of-life improvement after radiofrequency ablation versus cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and to assess the role of additional ablations beyond pulmonary vein isolation.
Does radiofrequency ablation provide similar quality of life improvement compared to cryoballoon ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=207)
Does radiofrequency ablation provide similar quality of life improvement compared to cryoballoon ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Both radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablation provide similar, sustained improvements in quality of life for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, with no added benefit from additional ablations beyond pulmonary vein isolation.
Observational data support similar quality-of-life benefits with either modality; leaves open need for randomized confirmation in paroxysmal AF.
Background: pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) improves health-related quality of life (QoL). This study compares QoL improvement after radiofrequency ablation (RF) and cryoballoon ablation (cryo) and assesses additional ablations’ role in QoL improvement. Methods: we evaluated the QoL of consecutive patients with first-time RF and cryo for PAF between January 2017 and June 2019. A combined EQ-VAS, AFEQT, and EQ-5D-3L paper questionnaire was sent to patients at baseline, 12, and 30 months after the procedure. Procedure and patient details were collected from medical notes. Results: the analysis included 207 patients, of which 127 (61%) had RF and 144 (70%) were males. RF patients had more additional ablations (52 [41%] versus 22 [28%], p = 0.01). There was a significant improvement from baseline to 12 months post-RF in AFEQT (43 ± 9 to 83 ± 7.8, p < 0.001), EQ-5D-3L (−0.01 ± 0.01 to 1.1 ± 0.02, p < 0.001), and EQ-VAS (51 ± 8 to 77 ± 13, p = 0.01). Similarly, an improvement at 12 months was observed after cryo in AFEQT (55 ± 11 to 77 ± 9, p < 0.001), EQ-5D-3L (−0.04 ± 0.03 to 1.3 ± 0.03, p < 0.001), and EQ-VAS (56 ± 7 to 85 ± 9, p = 0.01). QoL improvement was similar between RF and cryo. Additional ablations provided no additional QoL improvement compared to patients with PVI alone. Conclusions: Patients undergoing first-time PVI for PAF, RF, and cryo showed similar QoL improvement at 12 months, which was sustained at 30 months. Additional ablations did not provide further QoL benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antoun et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) (n=207). Radiofrequency ablation vs. Cryoballoon ablation was evaluated on Health-related quality of life (QoL) improvement at 12 and 30 months. Radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation yielded similar improvements in quality of life at 12 and 30 months, with no added benefit from additional ablations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: