Key result
Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of both thrombo-embolic events and death compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Current guidelines recommend anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation based on clinical risk factors regardless of AF presentation pattern, prompting a review to evaluate how the presentation pattern affects thrombo-embolic risk and mortality.
Does the presentation pattern of atrial fibrillation (non-paroxysmal vs. paroxysmal) affect thrombo-embolic risk and mortality?
Does the presentation pattern of atrial fibrillation (non-paroxysmal vs. paroxysmal) affect thrombo-embolic risk and mortality?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Non-paroxysmal AF is associated with a higher risk of thrombo-embolic events and mortality compared to paroxysmal AF, suggesting AF pattern could be integrated into risk models.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with a substantial increase in mortality and morbidity. Systemic thrombo-embolism is the most serious complication associated with this arrhythmia. The use of anticoagulant drugs is the cornerstone of therapy for the prophylaxis of stroke and peripheral ischaemia in these patients. The current guidelines recommend the use of anticoagulant drugs based on the thrombo-embolic risk profile of each individual patient calculated by SCORE based on the presence or absence of clinical risk factors and regardless of the presentation pattern of AF. A review of literature data investigating the effect of AF presentation pattern on thrombo-embolic risk and mortality showed an increased risk of both thrombo-embolic events and death in patients with non-paroxysmal AF compared to patients with paroxysmal AF. Most of these studies, however, consist of post-hoc analyses of large trials or observational studies and meta-analyses derived from these, resulting in an important limitation in the interpretation of data derived from such studies. At the same time, these data suggest the need for both new therapies to prevent AF progression and for further studies to explore the integration of AF presentation pattern into models of thrombo-embolic risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Turturiello et al. (2023) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation vs. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Thrombo-embolic events and death. Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of both thrombo-embolic events and death compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: