Why the study?
Current guidelines group all AF types together for anticoagulation based on comorbidities, but the relationship between AF pattern, AF burden threshold, and thromboembolic or mortality risk remains complex and incompletely characterized.
Does the pattern and burden of atrial fibrillation impact stroke risk and mortality?
Does the pattern and burden of atrial fibrillation impact stroke risk and mortality?
The pattern and burden of atrial fibrillation, alongside underlying comorbidities, synergistically determine the risk of stroke and mortality, suggesting a need for more nuanced risk stratification.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support refined AF stroke risk stratification; leaves open prospective validation of burden thresholds.
Thromboembolism is the most serious complication of AF, and oral anticoagulation is the mainstay therapy. Current guidelines place all AF types together in terms of anticoagulation with the major determinants being associated comorbidities translated into risk marker. Among patients in large clinical trials, those with non-paroxysmal AF appear to be at higher risk of stroke than those with paroxysmal AF. Higher complexity of the AF pattern is also associated with higher risk of mortality. Moreover, continuous monitoring of AF through cardiac implantable devices provided us with the concept of 'AF burden'. Usually, the larger the AF burden, the higher the risk of stroke; however, the relationship is not well characterised with respect to the threshold value above which the risk increases. The picture is more complex than it appears: AF and underlying disorders must act synergically respecting the magnitude of its own characteristics, which are the amount of time a patient stays in AF and the severity of associated comorbidities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Botto et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: