PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1984The Journal of Physiology259 citationsOpen Access

Synaptic mechanisms involved in the inspiratory modulation of vagal cardio‐inhibitory neurones in the cat.

View Full Paper
MGMichael P. GilbeyDJDavid L. JordanDRDiethelm W. Richter

Key Result

Cardiac vagal motoneurones in the cat receive an excitatory input during post-inspiration and a powerful chloride-mediated inhibitory synaptic input during inspiration.

Key Points

  • This research investigates how respiration affects the activity of vagal cardio-inhibitory neurones in cats.
  • Utilized electrophysiological and neuropharmacological techniques to examine 24 vagal efferent neurones.
  • Measured effects of DL-homocysteic acid and acetylcholine on neuronal firing rates.
  • Performed stable intracellular recordings from cardiac vagal motoneurones.
  • Vagal cardio-inhibitory neurones exhibit reduced firing during inspiration, influenced by excitatory and inhibitory inputs.
  • Acetylcholine caused decreased firing rates in 12 of 15 tested neurons, with atropine reversing this effect in some cases.
  • Neuronal input resistance decreases during inspiration due to chloride-mediated inhibitory post-synaptic potentials.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Cat model (24 vagal cardio-inhibitory neurones of the nucleus ambiguus)
I
Intervention
Electrophysiological and neuropharmacological evaluation (ionophoretic application of DL-homocysteic acid, acetylcholine, atropine)
O
Outcome
Neuronal firing rate and membrane potential changes during respiratory phasessurrogate

The study demonstrates that cardiac vagal motoneurones are modulated by respiratory phases, receiving powerful inhibitory synaptic input during inspiration.

Abstract

The respiratory modulation of the activity of vagal cardio-inhibitory neurones of the nucleus ambiguus of the cat has been investigated by electrophysiological and neuropharmacological techniques. All twenty-four vagal efferent neurones studied had axons with conduction velocities indicative of B fibres and projected to the right cardiac branches of the vagus. Their spontaneous or DL-homocysteic acid (DLH)-evoked activity showed a marked reduction during the phase of inspiration and all showed signs of receiving a baroreceptor input. Ionophoretic application of DLH always excited cardiac vagal motoneurones (c.v.m.s). Application of acetylcholine to these same cells provoked a decrease in firing rate in twelve of the fifteen neurones tested. In ten of these twelve cells simultaneous application of atropine antagonized the effect of acetylcholine. Atropine applied alone enhanced neuronal firing, particularly in inspiration. Stable intracellular recordings have been made from two c.v.m.s. These were inhibited during inspiration. Input resistance fell markedly during inspiration and injection of chloride reversed this wave of hyperpolarization to a wave of depolarization indicating that this resulted from chloride-mediated inhibitory post-synaptic potentials (i.p.s.p.s). These c.v.m.s were activated during Stage I expiration, and showed a weak and variable wave of inhibition in Stage II expiration. Pulse-rhythmic depolarizing potentials were reduced in their amplitudes during the periods of decreased neurone input resistance. It is concluded that c.v.m.s receive an excitatory input during post-inspiration and a powerful inhibitory synaptic input during inspiration. The implications of these observations for the physiology of cardiorespiratory reflexes are discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gilbey et al. (1984) studied this question. Electrophysiological and neuropharmacological techniques (DLH, acetylcholine, atropine) was evaluated on Neuronal firing rate and membrane potential during respiratory phases. Cardiac vagal motoneurones in the cat receive an excitatory input during post-inspiration and a powerful chloride-mediated inhibitory synaptic input during inspiration.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f9de7d03631df9ce9cd34https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015453
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper