Key result
Aerobic training counteracts arterial stiffening and aging, while resistance or combined training effects remain debated.
Why the study?
The effects of resistance or combined training on arterial distensibility remain questioned, and whether physical activity impacts normotensive and hypertensive subjects differently is debated.
This review highlights the established benefits of aerobic exercise on vascular function while noting that the effects of resistance or combined training on arterial distensibility remain debated.
Regular exercise is one of the main non-pharmacological measures suggested by several guidelines to prevent and treat the development of hypertension and cardiovascular disease through its impact on the vascular system. Routine aerobic training exerts its beneficial effects by means of several mechanisms: decreasing the heart rate and arterial pressure as well as reducing the activation of the sympathetic system and inflammation process without ignoring the important role that it plays in the metabolic profile. Through all these actions, physical training counteracts the arterial stiffening and aging that underlie the development of future cardiovascular events. While the role of aerobic training is undoubted, the effects of resistance training or combined-training exercise on arterial distensibility are still questioned. Moreover, whether different levels of physical activity have a different impact on normotensive and hypertensive subjects is still debated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Francesca Saladini (2023) conducted a review in Hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Physical activity (aerobic, resistance, combined) was evaluated on Vascular function and arterial distensibility. Routine aerobic training counteracts arterial stiffening and aging, while the effects of resistance or combined training on arterial distensibility remain debated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: