Key result
Elevated baseline heart rate over 70 bpm linked to ~32% greater cardiovascular event risk.
Why the study?
The predictive value of heart rate assessed using automated office blood pressure measurement on cardiovascular event risk in hypertensive patients with and without prior cardiovascular disease remained unknown.
Does baseline heart rate assessed by automated office blood pressure measurement predict cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients?
Observational (n=9,361)
Yes
Does baseline heart rate assessed by automated office blood pressure measurement predict cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients?
Effect estimate: HR 1.32 (95% CI 1.1-1.58)
p-value: p=0.003
Elevated heart rate (>70 bpm) measured by automated office blood pressure is associated with increased cardiovascular events and mortality in hypertensive patients, with low heart rate increasing MI risk in those with prior CVD.
May aid risk stratification via automated BP monitors in hypertension; extends prognostic data but leaves open whether lowering HR improves outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: The predictive value of heart rate (HR) assessed using an automated office blood pressure measurement (AOBPM) remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the impact of AOBPM HR on the risk of cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients with and without prior cardiovascular disease (CVD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 9361 participants of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (median follow‑up, 3.26 years) were used to perform a post hoc analysis based on baseline AOBPM HR levels (<50, 50-60, 60-70, 70-80, and >80 bpm). Clinical composite end point (CE) was defined as myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndrome other than MI, heart failure exacerbation, stroke, or cardiovascular death. Cardiovascular‑related and all‑cause mortalities were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1877 participants with and 7484 individuals without CVD were included. Those with higher baseline HR were less frequently men and more often smokers, had higher body mass index and estimated glomerular filtration rate, lower baseline systolic blood pressure, and higher diastolic blood pressure. No differences were observed in the CE frequency, its components, and all‑cause death between the baseline HR groups. Elevated HR (>70 bpm) was associated with a higher risk of CE, MI, and cardiovascular death in a multivariable Cox model. Moreover, the model determining the MI risk showed a J‑shaped relationship with HR and a significant interaction term (P = 0.049) between HR and CVD history. CONCLUSIONS: High AOBPM HR is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events and mortality, whereas low HR may result in higher MI risk in patients with previous CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sobieraj et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Hypertension with high cardiovascular risk (n=9,361). Elevated baseline heart rate (>70 bpm) assessed by AOBPM vs. Baseline heart rate ≤70 bpm was evaluated on Clinical composite end point (myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome other than MI, heart failure exacerbation, stroke, or cardiovascular death) (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.1-1.58, p=0.003). Elevated baseline heart rate (>70 bpm) assessed by automated office blood pressure measurement was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events (HR 1.32) compared to heart rate up to 70 bpm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: