Key result
Review analyzes critical issues and future perspectives for advanced HF therapies including transplantation and MCS.
Why the study?
Heart transplantation and mechanical supports for advanced heart failure both have critical issues that limit their use.
This review highlights the critical issues and future perspectives of heart transplantation and mechanical supports as destination therapies for end-stage heart failure.
Highlights unresolved challenges in end-stage HF; leaves open optimal strategies for transplantation and mechanical support pending prospective data.
Diagnostic and therapeutic advances in the cardiovascular field have caused a progressive reduction in mortality from acute causes, with an ever-increasing chronicity of cardiovascular pathologies. In recent years, mechanical supports have played a fundamental role, allowing the patient to be stabilized in the most critical phase of acute heart failure (AHF) and acting as a "bridge" for definitive therapies. Heart transplantation (HTx) is the gold-standard treatment for end-stage HF, but it is burdened by a series of critical issues that limit its use, first of all the shortage of grafts. It also requires the patient to take immunosuppressive therapy for life, which exposes him to a greater risk of infectious and oncological diseases. For these reasons, in the last years, mechanical supports are increasingly used as "destination therapy", alternatively to HTx. However, also mechanical supports are not free from critical issues that limit their use. In this review we aim to analyze critical issues and future perspectives of advanced HF therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fumarulo et al. (2024) conducted a review in Advanced heart failure. Heart transplantation and mechanical supports was evaluated. This review analyzes the critical issues and future perspectives of advanced heart failure therapies, including heart transplantation and mechanical circulatory support.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: