Key result
24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring revealed repetitive ventricular premature depolarizations in >50% of patients and ventricular tachycardia in 19%, proving superior to exercise testing.
Why the study?
Does 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring detect arrhythmias more effectively than exercise testing in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Observational (n=100)
Does 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring detect arrhythmias more effectively than exercise testing in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring is superior to exercise testing for detecting potentially high-risk arrhythmias in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
May support ambulatory ECG monitoring over exercise testing for arrhythmia detection in HCM; leaves open prospective validation of risk stratification.
Many patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy die suddenly and unexpectedly, a significant number perhaps due to arrhythmia. Of 100 patients initially evaluated for signs or symptoms suggestive of heart disease or a family history of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 51 were selected solely because they met the echocardiographic criteria for the disease, and 49 patients were selected primarily because they had: 1) normal sinus rhythm despite left atrial enlargement, 2) a history of syncope, 3) a family history of premature death, or 4) a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. All 100 patients were studied by 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring and 74 of them also underwent treadmill exercise testing. More than 50% of patients in repetitive ventricular premature depolarizations, including 19% who had ventricular tachycardia. Monitoring was superior to exercise testing for exposing these arrhythmias. Two patients experienced cardiac arrest within 2 months of monitoring; in each, monitoring had revealed ventricular tachycardia. Two patients with paroxysms of supraventricular tachycardia during monitoring developed fixed atrial fibrillation within 1 year. These preliminary observations suggest that monitoring may help identify patients at increased risk for significant arrhythmic events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Savage et al. (1979) conducted an observational in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=100). 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring vs. Treadmill exercise testing was evaluated on Prevalence of arrhythmias. 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring revealed repetitive ventricular premature depolarizations in >50% of patients and ventricular tachycardia in 19%, proving superior to exercise testing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: