Key result
CYP2C19 genotyping to guide clopidogrel shows conflicting clinical evidence despite high non-response rates in ACS.
Why the study?
Is CYP2C19 genotype testing useful in clinical practice to identify poor responders to clopidogrel among patients with CAD or ACS?
Is CYP2C19 genotype testing useful in clinical practice to identify poor responders to clopidogrel among patients with CAD or ACS?
There is currently conflicting evidence and guideline recommendations regarding the routine use of CYP2C19 genotyping to guide clopidogrel therapy in clinical practice.
Should not guide clopidogrel therapy in practice; leaves open need for definitive trials in ACS.
INTRODUCTION: P2Y12 inhibitors, including clopidogrel have become an integral part of treatment for patients receiving coronary stent placement as a result of stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and also for medically managed ACS patients. Areas covered: Clopidogrel efficacy can be significantly modified by polymorphism of CYP2C19 genotype (more than 25 allelic variants) involved in its metabolism that can adversely affect its anti-platelet activity. As a result, a substantial number of patients (20-30%) with ACS show an inadequate response to clopidogrel despite a standardized dosing regimen. Experts commentary: Currently, there is conflicting evidence in regards to the use of CYP2C19 genotyping to identify poor responders to clopidogrel in clinical practice. ACC/AHA guidelines do not recommend routine use of CYP2C19 in clinical practice, whereas Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines recommend its use to identify poor/intermediate metabolizers of Clopidogrel and suggest alternative P2Y12 inhibitors among ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. This review article will look at the literature evidence for the use of CYP2C19 genotyping in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeb et al. (2018) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes. CYP2C19 genotype testing was evaluated. CYP2C19 genotyping to identify poor responders to clopidogrel has conflicting evidence for clinical use, despite 20-30% of ACS patients showing inadequate response to standardized dosing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: