Key result
The automated Diasorin Liaison method for measuring plasma renin concentration yielded 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity for identifying primary aldosteronism compared to the conventional assay.
Why the study?
Does the automated PRC assay provide comparable diagnostic accuracy to the conventional PRA assay for primary aldosteronism screening?
Cross-Sectional (n=225)
Does the automated PRC assay provide comparable diagnostic accuracy to the conventional PRA assay for primary aldosteronism screening?
Effect estimate: 100% sensitivity, 93% specificity
The automated PRC assay is a feasible and accurate replacement for the conventional manual PRA assay in calculating the aldosterone/renin ratio for primary aldosteronism screening.
May support automated PRC for ARR screening in primary aldosteronism; leaves open need for prospective validation before replacing manual PRA.
BACKGROUND: Primary aldosteronism (PA), the most common secondary cause of hypertension, can be screened for using the aldosterone/renin ratio. This ratio is raised in PA and its accuracy depends on the ability to measure plasma renin at extremely low concentrations. METHODS: We compared two different procedures for assessing plasma renin. The conventional method, which measures plasma renin activity (PRA), is technically demanding and laborious, and the Diasorin Liaison method, which measures plasma renin concentration (PRC), is an automated immunoassay. Results from each method were used to calculate the aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) and the performance of the Diasorin Liaison method compared with that of the conventional assay using receiver operator characteristic curves. RESULTS: The analytical and functional sensitivity of the PRC method were 2.1 and 5 microIU/mL, respectively. Intra- and inter-assay precision were <7.2% and 10.4%, respectively. There was significant (9%) prorenin interference. Samples with PRA > 1.0 ng/mL/h showed significant correlation with PRC (r = 0.93; P < 0.05; n = 146); however, with PRA < 1.0 ng/mL/h, no significant correlation occurred (r = 0.14; P < 0.05; n = 79). An aldosterone (pmol/L)/PRC(microIU/mL) ratio of >35, in patients with aldosterone >300 pmol/L, resulted in 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity, when compared with the commonly accepted aldosterone (pmol/L)/PRA (ng/mL/h) ratio of >750, in identifying patients who may suffer from PA. CONCLUSION: This study indicates the feasibility of using the automated PRC assay as a replacement for the conventional manual PRA assay in calculating the ARR as a first-line screen for PA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dorrian et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Primary aldosteronism (n=225). Diasorin Liaison method (plasma renin concentration) vs. Conventional method (plasma renin activity) was evaluated on Identification of patients who may suffer from primary aldosteronism using aldosterone/PRC ratio >35 vs aldosterone/PRA ratio >750 (100% sensitivity, 93% specificity). The automated Diasorin Liaison method for measuring plasma renin concentration yielded 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity for identifying primary aldosteronism compared to the conventional assay.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: