Why the study?
The study was conducted to assess the incidence, outcomes, and risk factors of thrombocytopenia after TAVI using a corrected platelet count to avoid bias from hemodilution or hemoconcentration.
Does postoperative thrombocytopenia worsen clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI?
Does postoperative thrombocytopenia worsen clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI?
Postoperative thrombocytopenia after TAVI is associated with increased bleeding, longer hospital stays, and higher mortality.
Postoperative thrombocytopenia may flag higher bleeding risk after TAVI; this cohort study leaves open causality and need for prospective trials.
Background: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, outcomes, and risk factors associated with thrombocytopenia following TAVI according to a corrected platelet count (CPC), to avoid the bias of hemodilution/concentration. Methods: We analyzed patients who underwent TAVI in our center between 2009 and 2018. The study population were divided into three groups: none (NT), mild (MT), and severe (ST) postoperative thrombocytopenia. Primary outcomes were bleedings, length of hospital stay, and mortality. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess risk factors for ST. Results: A total of 907 patients were included in the analysis. MT was observed in 28.1% and ST in 2.6% of all patients. The following clinical outcomes were recorded: incidence of life-threatening and major bleeding (NT = 14.2%, MT = 20.8%, ST = 58.3%), the median length of hospital stay (NT = 8, MT = 10, ST = 14 days), in-hospital mortality (NT = 3.9%, MT = 6.3%, ST = 16.7%), and the overall significance in comparison with NT (p < 0.05). The logistic regression showed ST was associated with preoperative CPC, transapical access, diabetes mellitus, and the critical preoperative state. Conclusions: Worse clinical outcomes are associated with both MT and ST after TAVI. In particular, ST is associated with higher in-hospital and 30-day mortality. Management of modifiable baseline and procedural variables may improve this outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pollari et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: