Key result
Filtered QRS duration exhibits a significant circadian rhythm in healthy subjects, increasing at night, and is strongly correlated with heart rate (r = 0.95, p < 0.001) and autonomic tone.
Observational (n=20)
Effect estimate: r = 0.95
p-value: p=<0.001
In healthy subjects, filtered QRS duration exhibits a significant circadian rhythm that correlates closely with markers of autonomic tone.
Hypothesis-generating for autonomic modulation of QRS duration in health; leaves open prospective validation before clinical consideration.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the circadian variation in the signal averaged electrocardiogram (saECG) and heart rate variability and investigate their relations in healthy subjects. METHODS: 24 hour ECGs were obtained with a three channel recorder using bipolar X, Y, and Z leads in 20 healthy subjects. The following variables were determined hourly: heart rate, filtered QRS (f-QRS) duration, low and high frequency components of heart rate variability (LF and HF), and the LF/HF ratio. RESULTS: Heart rate, f-QRS duration, HF, and the LF/HF ratio showed significant circadian rhythms, as determined by the single cosinor method. Heart rate and the LF/HF ratio increased during daytime, and f-QRS duration and HF increased at night. f-QRS duration was negatively correlated with heart rate (r = 0.95, p < 0.001) and the LF/HF ratio (r = 0.94, p < 0.001) and positively with HF (r = 0.93, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: f-QRS duration has a significant circadian rhythm in healthy subjects and is closely related to the circadian rhythm of autonomic tone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakagawa et al. (1998) conducted an observational in Healthy subjects (n=20). 24 hour ECG monitoring was evaluated on Correlation between filtered QRS (f-QRS) duration and heart rate (r = 0.95, p=<0.001). Filtered QRS duration exhibits a significant circadian rhythm in healthy subjects, increasing at night, and is strongly correlated with heart rate (r = 0.95, p < 0.001) and autonomic tone.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: