Why the study?
Right heart failure is an important consequence of LVAD implantation, and this meta-analysis examined whether preoperative RV strain on speckle tracking echocardiography predicts postoperative RHF.
Does preoperative right ventricular strain on speckle tracking echocardiography predict postoperative right heart failure in patients undergoing LVAD implantation?
Does preoperative right ventricular strain on speckle tracking echocardiography predict postoperative right heart failure in patients undergoing LVAD implantation?
Preoperative right ventricular strain parameters assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography are significantly associated with the development of postoperative right heart failure following LVAD implantation.
May aid preoperative RHF risk stratification before LVAD; supports validation in prospective cohorts.
Introduction Right Heart Failure (RHF) is an important consequence of implant of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). Right ventricular (RV) analysis with speckle tracking echo (STE) can assist in the assessment of the RV. This meta-analysis examines preoperative RV strain on STE as a predictor of postoperative RHF. Methods Literature was reviewed in Pubmed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for studies reporting on the association of preoperative RV free wall (FWS), global longitudinal (GLS), and septal longitudinal (SLS) strain with postoperative RV failure following LVAD placement. Strain parameters were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 13 studies with 933 patients undergoing LVAD implantation met inclusion criteria. 254 patients subsequently developed RHF and 679 did not develop RHF. Mean follow up was 15 months. The mean age of participants was 55.9 years and 85% were male. Baseline RVFWS, RVGLS, and RVSLS were significantly reduced in patients who developed post-implantation RHF compared to patients who did not develop post-implantation RHF (MD 3.77, 95% CI 2.39, 5.15; p<0.01; MD 2.67, 95% CI 1.16, 4.17; p<0.01; MD 3.59, 95% CI 0.83, 6.35; p=0.01). The heterogeneity was considerable for all three analyses (RVFWS I2=88%, RVGLS I2=92%, RVSLS I2=83%), likely due to vendor-specific differences in strain measurements and differences in echocardiography lab protocols. To address this, a random-effects model was used. Conclusions Preoperative RV FWS, GLS, and SLS were all associated with postoperative RHF. STE may be helpful in risk stratification of RHF following LVAD implant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frye et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: