Why the study?
What is the 15-year survival rate of patients with severe obstructive coronary artery disease treated medically based on the number of affected arteries?
What is the 15-year survival rate of patients with severe obstructive coronary artery disease treated medically based on the number of affected arteries?
Long-term survival in medically treated severe coronary artery disease is strongly inversely related to the number of diseased vessels and left main involvement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Informs prognosis by vessel extent in medically managed CAD; extends observational survival data to 15 years.
Survival rates were determined for a group of 598 patients in whom severe coronary disease was demonstrated by arteriography; initially they were treated medically and were followed-up for 15 years. Deaths due to noncoronary causes were uncommon (5% of total) in the first 5 year period but were frequent (36%) in the third period. Survival rates were 48%, 28%, 18%, and 9% for patients with single-, double-, triple-, and left main artery disease, respectively. Abnormalities documented by ventriculography were related to survival. In 386 patients who would have been candidates for bypass surgery, survival rates were 58%, 35%, 26%, and 11% for those with single-, double-, triple-, and left main artery disease, respectively. Cardiac survival curves for single-, double-, and triple-artery disease in candidates for surgery and curves constructed on the basis of 3% mortality per artery per year corresponded fairly closely. When an abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) is considered as a single variable in multivariate analysis, 5 year survival rates of candidates for surgery were influenced by the following in order of importance: abnormal ECG, symptoms at least 5 years in duration, triple-artery disease, double-artery disease, and arteriosclerosis obliterans. A simple prognostic stratification was devised that used only ECGs and duration of symptoms for each subset based on the number of arteries affected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Proudfit et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: