Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Regression discontinuity analysis reveals region-specific conservation among California households, indicating climate and air conditioning drive electricity subsidy effectiveness.
Many countries use substantial public funds to subsidize reductions in negative externalities. Such policy designs create asymmetric incentives because increases in externalities remain unpriced. I investigate the implications of such policies by using a regression discontinuity design in California's electricity rebate program. Using household-level panel data, I find that the incentive produced precisely estimated zero treatment effects on energy conservation in coastal areas. In contrast, the rebate induced short-run and long-run consumption reductions in inland areas. Income, climate, and air conditioner saturation significantly drive the heterogeneity. Finally, I provide a cost-effectiveness analysis and investigate how to improve the policy design. (JEL D12, D62, H76, L94, L98, Q48)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koichiro Ito (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: