Why the study?
Does ICD implantation by nonelectrophysiologists increase procedural complications and reduce appropriate CRT-D use compared to electrophysiologists in patients receiving an ICD?
Population
111,293 patients receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator between January 2006 and June 2007…
Comparison
ICD implantation performed by… vs ICD implantation performed by electrophysiologists
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
In-hospital
Authors
Loading...
May warrant caution with non-electrophysiologist ICD implantation; leaves open whether volume thresholds or targeted training can equalize outcomes.
Does ICD implantation by nonelectrophysiologists increase procedural complications and reduce appropriate CRT-D use compared to electrophysiologists in patients receiving an ICD?
ICD implantation by nonelectrophysiologists is associated with a higher risk of procedural complications and a lower likelihood of receiving an indicated CRT-D device compared to implantation by electrophysiologists.
Jeptha P. Curtis (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: