PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2002Hypertension307 citations

Resistant Hypertension

View Full Paper
STSandra J. TalerSTStephen C. TextorJAJ. Augustine

Structured PICO

Does drug selection based on serial hemodynamic measurements improve blood pressure control in patients with resistant hypertension compared to clinical judgment alone?

P
Population
104 patients with resistant hypertension
I
Intervention
Antihypertensive drug selection and titration based on serial hemodynamic measurements by thoracic bioimpedance and a predefined algorithm in a 3-month intensive treatment program
C
Comparator
Antihypertensive drug selection directed by a hypertension specialist (clinical judgment) in a 3-month intensive treatment program
O
Outcome
Blood pressure reduction and control rates (</=140/90 mm Hg)surrogate

Using serial hemodynamic measurements by thoracic bioimpedance to guide antihypertensive therapy significantly improves blood pressure control in resistant hypertension compared to clinical judgment alone.

Abstract

Although resistant hypertension affects a minority of all hypertensives, this group continues to experience disproportionately high cardiovascular event rates despite newer antihypertensive agents. Hypertension represents an imbalance of hemodynamic forces within the circulation, usually characterized by elevated systemic vascular resistance. We studied the utility of serial hemodynamic parameters in the selection and titration of antihypertensive medication in resistant hypertensive patients using highly reproducible noninvasive measurements by thoracic bioimpedance. Resistant hypertension patients (n=104) were randomized to drug selection based either on serial hemodynamic (HD) measurements and a predefined algorithm or on drug selection directed by a hypertension specialist (SC) in a 3-month intensive treatment program. Blood pressure was lowered by intensified drug therapy in both treatment groups (169+/-3/87+/-2 to 139+/-2/72+/-1 mm Hg HD versus 173+/-3/91+/-2 to 147+/-2/79+/-1 mm Hg SC, P<0.01 for systolic and diastolic BP), using similar numbers and intensity of antihypertensive medications. Blood pressures were reduced further for those treated according to hemodynamic measurements, resulting in improved control rates (56% HD versus 33% SC controlled to </=140/90 mm Hg, P<0.05) and incremental reduction in systemic vascular resistance measurements. Although the number of patients taking diuretics did not differ between groups, final diuretic dosage was higher in the hemodynamic cohort. Our results demonstrate superior blood pressure control using a treatment algorithm and serial hemodynamic measurements compared with clinical judgment alone in a randomized prospective study. Our measurements of thoracic fluid volume support occult volume expansion as a mediator of antihypertensive drug resistance and use of impedance measurements to guide advancing diuretic dose and adjustment of multidrug antihypertensive treatment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Taler et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0fcbb301be78fe81600c1ahttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.0000016176.16042.2f
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper