Why the study?
Does a straight sequential programmed electrical stimulation protocol improve the yield ratio of inducible clinical ventricular tachycardia compared to a tandem method?
Does a straight sequential programmed electrical stimulation protocol improve the yield ratio of inducible clinical ventricular tachycardia compared to a tandem method?
A simple sequential programmed electrical stimulation protocol is efficient and effective for inducing clinical ventricular tachycardia without being at a disadvantage compared to more complex tandem protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sequential PES matches tandem inducibility with less time; supports efficiency but leaves open optimal protocol selection in larger cohorts.
Fisher et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: