Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 1, 2007Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

A Framework for Recording Recurrences, Reinjuries, and Exacerbations in Injury Surveillance

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Design

Other

Authors

CFColin W FullerGeneral CardiologyRoald BahrRoald BahrInternational Olympic CommitteeRDRandall W. DickBritish Athletics

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Refines recurrent injury surveillance in athletes; extends prior frameworks by distinguishing reinjuries from exacerbations based on recovery status.

Key Points

  • The study aims to establish a cohesive framework for categorizing recurrent injuries based on recovery status of the initial injury.
  • Developed a recording and reporting framework for recurrent injuries.
  • Subcategorized recurrent injuries into reinjuries and exacerbations.
  • Defined recovery status based on medical opinion.
  • Identified the need for consistent terminology in injury classification.
  • Facilitated separate investigation of risk factors for reinjuries and exacerbations.
  • Enhanced understanding of rehabilitation effectiveness prior to return to play.

PICO

P
Population
Recurrent injuries
I
Intervention / Comparator
Recording and reporting framework for recurrent injuries

Provides a standardized framework to differentiate between reinjuries and exacerbations in injury surveillance to better investigate risk factors and rehabilitation efficacy.

Cite This Study

Fuller et al. (2007) studied Recurrent injuries. Recording and reporting framework for recurrent injuries was evaluated. A proposed recording and reporting framework subcategorizes recurrent injuries into reinjuries and exacerbations based on whether a player was fully recovered from the preceding index injury.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0fd62d4fb650da4ffe8f23https://doi.org/10.1097/jsm.0b013e3180471b89
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Influence of Definition and Data Collection on the Incidence of Injuries in Football2000 · 312 citations
  2. 2Consensus Statement on Injury Definitions and Data Collection Procedures for Studies of Injuries in Rugby Union2007 · 221 citations
  3. 3Assessing Causation in Sport Injury1994 · 429 citations
  4. 4Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use.1984 · 2,147 citations
  5. 5Consensus statement on injury definitions and data collection procedures for studies of injuries in rugby union2007 · 636 citations