Key result
MIS-C is linked to worse heart rate variability than isolated viral myocarditis and healthy controls.
Why the study?
Autonomic nervous system function can be evaluated by heart rate variability, but heart rate variability had not previously been assessed and compared between pediatric multisystem inflammatory syndrome and isolated viral myocarditis/myopericarditis.
Does heart rate variability differ between pediatric patients with multisystem inflammatory syndrome, isolated viral myocarditis/myopericarditis, and healthy controls?
Observational (n=182)
No
Does heart rate variability differ between pediatric patients with multisystem inflammatory syndrome, isolated viral myocarditis/myopericarditis, and healthy controls?
Heart rate variability is significantly impaired in pediatric patients with multisystem inflammatory syndrome compared to those with isolated viral myocarditis and healthy controls, suggesting its potential utility as a non-invasive prognostic marker.
INTRODUCTION AND AIM: In pediatric multisystem inflammatory syndrome and isolated viral myocarditis/myopericarditis, autonomic nervous system function can be evaluated by a non-invasive method called heart rate variability. This study aims to evaluate heart rate variability in these two groups by comparing them with each other. This is the first study assessing these values in these two groups of patients. METHOD: Patients who are diagnosed with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children and isolated viral myocarditis/myopericarditis at a university hospital from September 2021 to February 2023 are screened by electrocardiography, echocardiography, and 24-hour Holter monitoring. A healthy control group, compatible in age and gender with the patient groups, was selected from healthy subjects that applied to the hospital for palpitation, murmur, and/or chest pain. Heart rate variability parameters and related laboratory markers were analyzed and compared among the three groups. RESULTS: There were 30 patients with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, 43 patients with isolated viral myocarditis/myopericarditis, and 109 participants in the healthy control group. Statistically significant differences were found in most of the heart rate variability parameters: standard deviation of normal to normal intervals (SDNN), the mean of the 5- minute RR interval standard deviations (SDNNİ), the standard deviation of 5-minute R wave to R wave(RR) interval means (SDANN), the root mean square of successive RR interval differences (RMSSD), and the percentage of the beats with a consecutive RR interval difference of more than 50 ms (pNN50%), very low frequency, high frequency, low frequency, triangular index, and low frequency/high-frequency ratio. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children patients had impaired and declined heart rate variability values compared to the other two groups. In patients with myocarditis/myopericarditis, we couldn't find a significant difference in these parameters with the control group. CONCLUSION: Heart rate variability can be used as an important non-invasive autonomic function parameter in determining prognosis and treatment plans, especially in patients diagnosed with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. This impairment of autonomic activity could be more prominent in patients with decreased left ventricular systolic functions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duman et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children and isolated viral myocarditis/myopericarditis (n=182). Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children vs. Isolated viral myocarditis/myopericarditis and healthy controls was evaluated on Heart rate variability parameters (SDNN, SDNNİ, SDANN, RMSSD, pNN50%, VLF, HF, LF, triangular index, and LF/HF ratio). Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (n=30) was associated with significantly impaired heart rate variability compared to isolated viral myocarditis (n=43) and healthy controls (n=109).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: