Why the study?
Does C-reactive protein play a causal or protective role in the development of atherosclerosis?
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
CRP modulation should not yet guide therapy; leaves open its causal versus protective role in human atherosclerosis.
The connection between C-reactive protein (CRP) and atherosclerosis lies on three grounds. First, the concentration of CRP in the serum, which is measured by using highly sensitive (a.k.a. 'hs') techniques, correlates with the occurrence of cardiovascular disease. Second, although CRP binds only to Fcgamma receptor-bearing cells and, in general, to apoptotic and damaged cells, almost every type of cultured mammalian cells has been shown to respond to CRP treatment. Many of these responses indicate proatherogenic functions of CRP but are being reinvestigated using CRP preparations that are free of endotoxins, sodium azide, and biologically active peptides derived from the protein itself. Third, CRP binds to modified forms of low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and, when aggregated, CRP can bind to native LDL as well. Accordingly, CRP is seen with LDL and damaged cells at the atherosclerotic lesions and myocardial infarcts. In experimental rats, human CRP was found to increase the infarct size, an effect that could be abrogated by blocking CRP-mediated complement activation. In the Apob (100/100) Ldlr (-/-) murine model of atherosclerosis, human CRP was shown to be atheroprotective, and the importance of CRP-LDL interactions in this protection was noted. Despite all this, at the end, the question whether CRP can protect humans from developing atherosclerosis remains unanswered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: