Why the study?
What is the accuracy of different electronic health record queries for identifying hospitalizations for acute congestive heart failure?
What is the accuracy of different electronic health record queries for identifying hospitalizations for acute congestive heart failure?
Combining primary ICD-9 diagnosis codes with laboratory values like BNP >500 pg/mL significantly improves the positive predictive value for identifying acute heart failure hospitalizations in EHR databases.
Combined ICD-9 plus BNP queries may improve EHR case-finding accuracy for acute HF; leaves open optimal algorithms for research databases.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Electronic health records databases are increasingly used for identifying cohort populations, covariates, or outcomes, but discerning such clinical 'phenotypes' accurately is an ongoing challenge. We developed a flexible method using overlapping (Venn diagram) queries. Here we describe this approach to find patients hospitalized with acute congestive heart failure (CHF), a sampling strategy for one-by-one 'gold standard' chart review, and calculation of positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivities, with SEs, across different definitions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used retrospective queries of hospitalizations (2002-2011) in the Indiana Network for Patient Care with any CHF ICD-9 diagnoses, a primary diagnosis, an echocardiogram performed, a B-natriuretic peptide (BNP) drawn, or BNP >500 pg/mL. We used a hybrid between proportional sampling by Venn zone and over-sampling non-overlapping zones. The acute CHF (presence/absence) outcome was based on expert chart review using a priori criteria. RESULTS: Among 79,091 hospitalizations, we reviewed 908. A query for any ICD-9 code for CHF had PPV 42.8% (SE 1.5%) for acute CHF and sensitivity 94.3% (1.3%). Primary diagnosis of 428 and BNP >500 pg/mL had PPV 90.4% (SE 2.4%) and sensitivity 28.8% (1.1%). PPV was <10% when there was no echocardiogram, no BNP, and no primary diagnosis. 'False positive' hospitalizations were for other heart disease, lung disease, or other reasons. CONCLUSIONS: This novel method successfully allowed flexible application and validation of queries for patients hospitalized with acute CHF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosenman et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: