Why the study?
Does contact force-guided CPVI reduce AF recurrence and residual conduction gaps compared to conventional CPVI in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Population
100 consecutive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing circumferential pulmonary vein…
Comparison
Contact force-guided circumferential pulmonary… vs Conventional CPVI using a ThermoCool EZ Steer…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
12 months
Authors
Loading...
Contact force-guided CPVI was associated with higher 12-month success; hypothesis-generating for randomized trials in paroxysmal AF.
Does contact force-guided CPVI reduce AF recurrence and residual conduction gaps compared to conventional CPVI in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Contact force-guided CPVI significantly reduces procedure time, fluoroscopy time, residual conduction gaps, and AF recurrence at 12 months compared to conventional CPVI in patients with paroxysmal AF.
Itoh et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: