This article reconstructs the doctrine of ləbbuna in Ḥatäta Zär’a Yaʿǝqob, revealing its implications for understanding religious disagreement.
This article reconstructs the central doctrine of the Ḥatäta Zär’a Yaʿǝqob by analyzing the faculty of ləbbuna , a term variously translated as ‘reason,’ ‘understanding,’ ‘conscience,’ or ‘heart.’ I first reconstruct the Ḥatäta’s core problem: perspective-relative justification in religious disagreement, against the seventeenth-century backdrop of interconfessional conflict in the Ethiopian highlands. I then offer a systematic account of ləbbuna as an anti-relativistic solution to this problem. I show how ləbbuna functions as a universal, divinely-endowed capacity for discerning the śərʿatä fəṭrät (the established order of creation), thereby providing an independent standard for judgement. I identify six defining features of ləbbuna : its independence from any haymanot or ‘creed’; its grounding in a metaphysical harmony between creation, the Creator and human minds; its divine origin; its ethical-epistemic unity; its immediacy and conditional infallibility; and its arduousness. I conclude by clarifying what is (and is not) at stake in describing Zär’a Yaʿǝqob as a rationalist.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonathan Egid (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: