Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study evaluates clinical relevance and acceptability of a hamstring rehabilitation pathway in elite sport practitioners, suggesting strong agreement on its applicability.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the perspectives of practitioners working in elite-level sport on a structured hamstring rehabilitation pathway, evaluating its perceived clinical relevance, acceptability, and practical application. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study METHODS: A steering group of senior clinicians at the Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar, developed a hamstring rehabilitation pathway guided by the Knowledge-To-Action Framework. Following an internal review it was externally evaluated by 32 elite-level sports practitioners prior to attending a two-day pre-conference workshop at the Aspetar International Rehabilitation Conference 2024. Participants completed a structured survey comprising a mixture of closed (answered on a 5-point Likert scale) questions and open feedback. RESULTS: Of 32 invited practitioners, 24 (75%) submitted the survey. Respondents worked exclusively in elite sport and held advanced academic qualifications. Survey question completion was high (97%), with strong overall agreement (92%). Sections demonstrated high individual agreement: assessment (93%), milestones (92%), strength (92%), motor control (92%), running (93%), explosiveness and reactive strength (94%) and Aspetar week (85%). CONCLUSION: Practitioners working in elite sport reported high agreement regarding the perceived clinical relevance, acceptability, and practical applicability of the Aspetar hamstring injury rehabilitation pathway.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simpson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: