Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional survey assesses agreement among practitioners on rehabilitation pathway for elite athletes, highlighting key areas of consensus.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate agreement and clinical acceptability among practitioners working in elite sport regarding a rectus femoris rehabilitation pathway for elite and high-level athletes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: Experienced rehabilitation clinicians from the Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar, developed a rectus femoris rehabilitation pathway that comprised eight sections: assessment, milestones, strength, motor control, explosiveness and reactive strength, running, kicking, and weekly schedule. Following internal review, a draft of the pathway was distributed to practitioners who were attending the Aspetar International Rehabilitation Conference 2024 pre-conference workshop (N = 32). Participants rated agreement with key elements using a 5-point Likert scale (75% a priori threshold for high agreement). Survey responses (N = 27) were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: Overall agreement was high (89%) and disagreement was low (2%). The running section had the highest agreement (94%). The strength section had the lowest disagreement (0%). Weekly scheduling was the only section to not reach high agreement (67%), while explosiveness and reactive strength showed the highest disagreement (6%). These findings demonstrate high agreement with key components of a criteria-based, multifactorial rehabilitation pathway, while noting sport-specific and scheduling constraints. CONCLUSION: High agreement was observed among practitioners suggesting alignment with current practices in elite sport.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wallace et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: