Evaluates digital twin framework enhancing cooling system performance in naval power electronics, indicating significant improvements.
The next generation of naval and defense systems will strain current naval ship cooling systems. Throughout its life-cycle, this strain will alter the behavior of the physical system, and any virtual representation of the system will become outdated due to component aging. Digital twins are a trending tool that can assimilate real-time sensor data to tailor a virtual representation to its physical counterpart. The online faithful virtual representation of the physical system provided by digital twins can be used for real-time system optimizations and proactive fault detection, diagnostics, and control adjustments, alleviating the stress of component aging. To support these complex power systems throughout their lifecycles, data-driven solutions for digital twin tuning will become essential. This paper investigates the application of a parameter-tuning digital twin framework to enhance the performance of a multi-physics model. The digital twin framework comprises a digital twin tuning scheme, a physical testbed designed to emulate the cooling system of a ship, and a multi-physics representation of that system. The digital twin tuning scheme leverages a swarm of particles and online sensor data to evaluate permutations of parameters to update the digital representation periodically. The digital twin framework was applied to a physical system to provide experimental data results demonstrating the usefulness of the tuning system. The physical system was designed and constructed to emulate the heat generation and dissipation from 6 liquid-cooled power converters under loads ranging from 10–15 kW at 99% efficiency. Two scenarios were applied to evaluate the performance of the digital twin framework. Results demonstrate that the digital twin framework can adapt to system changes in real-time and improve the accuracy of the related virtual representation by more than 90% when measured at four points of the system under test.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Priddy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: