Key result
Galantamine pretreatment mitigates doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in rats by reducing oxidative damage, inflammation, and apoptosis.
Why the study?
This study sought to ascertain the cardioprotective benefits of galantamine against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity and elucidate the underlying molecular pathways.
RCT
randomized to four groups
Should not alter doxorubicin regimens; leaves open galantamine cardioprotection pending human trials.
BACKGROUND: This work sought to ascertain the cardioprotective benefits of GALA versus cardiotoxicity triggered by DOX and elucidate the fundamental molecular pathways. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rats were randomized to four groups, as follows: control, GALA (5 mg/kg, P.O.), DOX single dose (20 mg/kg, I.P), and DOX + GALA. RESULTS: Unlike the DOX group, GALA pretreatment mitigated cardiotoxicity, as revealed by a notable drop in serum CK-MB and CTnI, along with marked improvement in the histopathological features of heart tissues. GALA also diminished oxidative damage, as recognized by reduced MDA and elevated GSH and SOD. Moreover, GALA pretreatment reduced DOX-induced inflammation, as revealed by a decline in NF-κB, along with TNF-α and IL-6. Furthermore, GALA pretreatment mitigated DOX's apoptotic effects, as revealed by reduced Bax and caspase-3, alongside an elevation in Bcl-2 and its upstream signaling pathway PI3K/AKT. CONCLUSION: These findings indicated that GALA's protective impact versus DOX-induced cardiotoxicity is attributed to its capability to modulate PI3K/AKT, Bax/Bcl-2, and NF-κB/TNF-α pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abozaid et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. galantamine (GALA) vs. DOX single dose (20 mg/kg, I.P) and control was evaluated on cardiotoxicity (serum CK-MB and CTnI). Galantamine pretreatment mitigated doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in rats by reducing oxidative damage, inflammation, and apoptosis via PI3K/AKT, Bax/Bcl-2, and NF-κB/TNF-α pathways.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: