This analysis investigates anger and empathy in Lucrece's story, highlighting women's agency and voice.
This paper explores Shakespeare's contrapuntal depictions of empathy, grief, and rage in The Rape of Lucrece . I argue that Lucrece's position as alert interpreter of myth also provides a model for the reader's own agency. While the poem depicts Lucrece (and women more generally) as vulnerable wax, I propose that it also shows how the susceptibility to pity is a valuable trait that should be balanced with rage, especially given the contemporary efforts to ignore women's voices and their agency over their bodies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patricia Wareh (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: