Demonstrates reduced screw loosening in implants with preload, highlighting clinical implications.
Aim: This study aimed to compare the mechanical behavior of the implant-abutment connection in cases where appropriate preloading is performed or not.Materials and Methods: A total of 54 bone-level implants with a diameter of 3.5 mm were employed in this study. Each group was further divided into subgroups, each of which was tightened manually and with a torque wrench, and a total of six groups were tested, three of them being control groups. Manual tightening was performed by the same researcher with maximum manual force and tightening with a torque wrench was performed with a value of 30 Ncm by the same researcher. Sample measurement values in which connection compliance is evaluated using micro-CT.Results: The total space volume between the screw and the implant body (single torque minimum 0.32 mm³) decreased significantly in the samples tightened for the second time (minimum 0.20 mm³). Still, no difference was observed between tightening manually or with a torque wrench a second time, except for the angled abutment group.Conclusion: Tightening a second time after preload significantly reduced the gap values, especially when using a torque wrench. Therefore, tightening the implants repeatedly using a torque wrench after preloading (retightening) plays a significant role in clinically preventing screw loosening and consequently major clinical problems such as screw fractures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kılıçarslan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: