Objective: This in vitro study aims to investigate how different bioactive base materials influence the bond strength of two universal adhesive systems, Single Bond Universal and Prime&Bond Universal, when applied to dentin-liner complexes. Understanding the interaction between adhesives and base materials is critical to improving the longevity of restorations placed in deep cavities.Methods: Eighty extracted human molars were sectioned and standardized dentin surfaces were prepared. Four bioactive base materials (TheraCal LC, Riva LC, Riva SC, and BioMTA+) were applied, followed by one of the two universal adhesives. Composite build-ups were placed and specimens underwent 10,000 thermocycles to simulate oral aging. Shear bond strength (SBS) testing was performed, and failure modes were analyzed microscopically. A two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests were used (α = 0.05).Results: The type of base material had a statistically significant effect on bond strength (p < 0.001), while the adhesive brand did not (p = 0.247). TheraCal LC yielded the highest mean bond strength (20.6 ± 2.1 MPa), whereas BioMTA+ showed the lowest (10.2–11.4 MPa). A failure mode analysis revealed that cohesive failures predominated in the BioMTA+ group, suggesting internal material weakness.Conclusions: The bond strength of universal adhesives is substantially affected by the choice of bioactive base material. TheraCal LC demonstrated superior performance, which is likely due to its resin-modified composition and light-curing capability. No significant differences were observed between the two adhesives tested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çakmakçi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: