Key result
Opium use linked to ~50% higher MACE risk vs non-users.
Why the study?
Despite beliefs that opium may exert protective effects against cardiovascular diseases, its association with major adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing angiography remained to be evaluated.
Does opium use increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with suspected CAD undergoing angiography?
Cohort (n=2,759)
No
Does opium use increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with suspected CAD undergoing angiography?
Opium use in patients undergoing coronary angiography is associated with more severe coronary disease and a higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events, challenging the misconception that it has protective cardiovascular effects.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Opium use raises MACE risk in angiography patients; challenges presumed protective effects and supports avoidance counseling.
Objective: It is believed that opium, as a narcotic substance, may have protective effects against various disorders such as cardiovascular diseases. The association between opium use and the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients undergoing angiography was assessed in this study. Materials and Methods: The present descriptive-analytical study was conducted on patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent angiography at Razi Hospital, Birjand, Iran from June 2018 to November 2020. Participants were considered into two groups: Addicted (i.e. opium users) and non-opium users. Demographic information, medical history, history of opium use, and the SYNTAX score were collected. Results: A total of 2,759 individuals with a mean age of 60.12 ± 18.12 years (ranging from 18 to 94 years) were included. Among the participants, 59.4% were male, with 627 identified as opium users and 2,132 as non-users. The opium user group exhibited significantly lower body mass index (BMI), and frequency of diabetes mellitus and hypertension compared to the non-opium user group (p<0.001). Conversely, the incidence of stenosis ≥50%, moderate SYNTAX score, and MACE incidence were remarkably higher among opium users compared to non-users (p<0.01 to p<0.001). Logistic regression analyses indicated a significant relationship between age, SYNTAX score, prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and opium use with cardiovascular procedures. Conclusion: These results indicate that opium use is associated with increased stenosis and SYNTAX score, as well as a higher incidence of myocardial infarction and PCI, thereby increasing the odds ratio for cardiovascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rafati et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) (n=2,759). Opium use vs. Non-opium use was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.05-2.31, p=0.02). Opium use in patients undergoing coronary angiography was independently associated with a significantly higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 1.5) compared to non-users.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: