Systematic review and meta-analysis highlight cost-effective maternal and neonatal health interventions in Ethiopia, suggesting optimization strategies.
Despite recent improvements in health service coverage, maternal and neonatal mortality remain major public health concerns in Ethiopia. Evidence regarding cost-effectiveness is crucial for prioritizing interventions within the Essential Health Services Package, particularly in resource-constrained settings. This study aims to systematically review and conduct a meta-analysis on the cost-effectiveness of maternal and neonatal health (MNH) interventions in Ethiopia. We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, African Journals Online; including the Ethiopian Journal of Health Development, Tufts Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry, and Google Scholar) from January 2000 to December 2024. A total of twelve studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed for interventions with three or more comparable estimates utilizing the DerSimonian-Laird method. The pooled incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) showed high cost-effectiveness for key neonatal interventions: US$6.23 per DALY averted (95% CI: 4.22–8.23; I2 = 64.10%; n = 4) for neonatal resuscitation and US$8.78 per DALY averted (95% CI: 3.78–13.77; I2 = 90.98%; n = 3) for neonatal sepsis management. Antenatal care had a pooled ICER of US$91.93 per DALY averted (95% CI: 62.84–121.02; I2 = 79.65%; n = 5). The overall pooled ICER across all 12 studies was US$15.47 per DALY averted (95% CI: 11.07–19.87; I2 = 94.14%), but high heterogeneity (primarily due to intervention diversity) severely limits direct comparability; subgroup analyses provide the most reliable insights. Neonatal resuscitation, sepsis management, and antenatal care are cost-effective interventions (all pooled ICERs substantially below commonly referenced Ethiopian contextual benchmarks, such as around 1 × projected 2025 GDP per capita of ≈US$950–1,100 per DALY averted, though we note debates on GDP-based approaches and the importance of opportunity costs and affordability). Community-based scale-up in rural regions can optimize outcomes. PROSPERO registration number: CRD420251182108.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sima et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: