Randomized trial reveals enhanced accuracy in financial question answering, suggesting a new approach to data governance.
Expert financial question answering over SEC filings demands numeric faithfulness and auditable provenance, yet single-pass RAG systems silently hallucinate figures and offer no mechanism to recognize their own failures. Compounding this, financial deployments operate under a "walled garden" constraint: web-search fallbacks used by prior corrective RAG methods are prohibited by data governance. We present Self-Improving RAG, a training-free framework that decomposes document QA into three specialized agents (Retrieval, Reasoning, Judge) coordinated by an orchestrator with feedback-driven retry. When the Judge scores an answer below a dynamic threshold, the system escalates in place, broader retrieval, more careful prompting, and relaxed acceptance, never leaving the authorized corpus. On FinanceBench, our approach reaches 86% accuracy under oracle-guided evaluation (up from 53% single-pass) with a 36.4% Lazarus Rate, recovering nearly four in ten initially wrong answers. We additionally report an honest caveat: under fully blind deployment the same judge accepts only 31%, exposing judge quality, not the retry loop, as the true bottleneck for regulated finance QA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Junjie Xiong (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: