Computational evaluation demonstrates improved question answering accuracy under strict temporal boundaries in financial filings, highlighting the need for time-aware multimodal retrieval.
Financial question answering is often treated as document question answering, although financial evidence is both multimodal and time-dependent. Semantically equivalent facts expressed in narrative text, tables, page images, or Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) should support consistent answers, whereas a disclosure may support a query only after becoming public. We formalise this combination as crossmodal evidence symmetry under a causal temporal boundary and introduce TempFinRAG, a multimodal temporal retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework for point-in-time financial question answering. Given a question, company, and as-of date, the framework enforces the information boundary defined by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing availability; aligns page layout, text, table structure, and XBRL facts; retrieves time-valid evidence; executes auditable financial calculations; and generates a cited answer. A verifier checks temporal validity, claim support, numerical consistency, and the need to abstain. We further introduce TempFinQA, a point-in-time evaluation protocol built from public filings and XBRL facts, and evaluate the framework on complementary evidence-grounded, numerical, conversational, and multi-table benchmarks. On TempFinQA, TempFinRAG improves answer accuracy from 66.7% to 78.9% over hybrid RAG while reducing temporal evidence leakage from 10.8% to 1.7% and hallucination from 17.3% to 7.9%. Reliable financial question answering therefore requires consistent treatment across evidence representations and deliberately asymmetric access across time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: