Evaluates robustness of AI driving framework in urban traffic scenarios, suggesting key improvements for real-world application.
Autonomous driving in complex urban environments remains challenging due to perception uncertainty, dynamic multi-agent interactions, and control instability under adverse conditions. Despite advances in individual components, systematic evaluations of fully integrated modular pipelines under compounded urban disturbances remain scarce. This work presents a modular autonomous driving framework in CARLA Town10HD, integrating Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based perception using ResNet-18, global path planning via A* algorithm, and two control strategies: a classical Proportional–Integral–Derivative (PID) controller and a Deep Q-Network (DQN) agent with adaptive geometric steering assistance. A structured protocol assessed robustness across five scenarios: Heavy Rain, Dense Fog, Nighttime Driving, Dense Traffic, and Combined Extreme Conditions. The perception module achieved F1-scores close to 0.99 for traffic-sign, pedestrian, and lane classification; results reflect synthetic CARLA data and should not be interpreted as real-world generalization. The PID controller produced smoother trajectories with lower steering oscillations, while the DQN agent achieved faster traversal times at the cost of higher control variability. Route efficiency remained around 0.96 under isolated disturbances and decreased to 0.52 under compounded conditions, confirming sensitivity to multi-factor complexity. This study contributes a reproducible multi-scenario benchmark quantifying stability–adaptability trade-offs between classical and learning-based control, identifying scenario generalization and simulation-to-reality transfer as key future directions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quezada-Godoy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: