Randomized trial evaluates a curriculum approach improving decision-making in autonomous vehicles, suggesting enhanced safety and efficiency.
Decision-making is a fundamental component of autonomous driving, where complex urban scenarios require safe, robust, and adaptable behaviours. This work presents a curriculum learning approach to reduce the dynamics-related reality gap in autonomous driving decision-making through a hybrid architecture that combines learning-based tactical decisions with classical planning and control methods. The proposed methodology follows a staged sim-to-real process: first, the decision-making policies are trained in a lightweight simulator to learn basic kinematic behaviours; then, they are transferred and refined in CARLA to account for vehicle dynamics; subsequently, a digital twin of the real platform and test environment is used for scenario-specific fine-tuning; finally, the resulting architecture is validated through parallel execution with a real vehicle. The proposed approach focuses on vehicle dynamics, actuation response, and scenario geometry rather than on the complete sim-to-real problem for autonomous driving. The approach is evaluated across multiple urban driving scenarios in simulation, including lane changing, roundabouts, merging, and crossroads, while real-world validation is conducted in a controlled merge scenario. Experimental results show that the proposed curriculum improves training efficiency and final performance across the different stages, achieving success rates above 91% in SMARTS. In CARLA, the proposed architecture completes the evaluated scenarios up to 50% faster than the Autopilot baseline while improving comfort and safety-related metrics in terms of acceleration and jerk. The real-world parallel execution experiment further demonstrates the feasibility of transferring the decision-making architecture to a physical vehicle under controlled conditions. Finally, an ablation study quantifies the contribution of each curriculum stage to the overall system performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gutiérrez-Moreno et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: