Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares short-term memory retention in grade 12 students using different note-taking methods, indicating digital notes may enhance recall.
This study examined the differences in short-term memory retention between handwritten and digital note-taking among Grade 12 students of Dr. Yanga’s Colleges, Inc. Using a quasi-experimental design, 25 purposively selected students were divided into two groups: handwritten note-taking (n = 14) and digital note-taking (n = 11). Participants viewed the same standardized instructional video and completed an immediate free-recall retention test. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Mann–Whitney U test, and Pearson correlation. Findings revealed that students who used digital note-taking obtained higher mean retention scores (M = 16.27) and greater recall accuracy (81%) compared to those who used handwritten notes (M = 11.43; 57%). Statistical analysis showed a significant difference in immediate retention between the two groups (U = 27.5, p = 0.003), indicating that digital note-taking was more effective for short-term recall. Furthermore, a very strong positive correlation (r = 0.83) was found between note quality and retention scores, suggesting that well-organized and comprehensive notes enhance memory retention regardless of modality. The findings highlight the importance of effective note-taking strategies and suggest that digital note-taking may provide advantages in immediate academic recall among senior high school students.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cruz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: