Why the study?
Because myocardial scar depth from HP-SD ablation can be shallower than conventional MP-MD ablation, potential differences between these two strategies during PVI required investigation.
Does high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation compared to middle-power middle-duration ablation improve procedural efficiency and outcomes in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation?
Does high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation compared to middle-power middle-duration ablation improve procedural efficiency and outcomes in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation?
HP-SD ablation reduces procedure time compared to MP-MD ablation, but may result in higher rates of early reconnections at specific segments like the right anterior carina, suggesting a segment-specific combination approach may be optimal.
HP-SD may shorten PVI times but requires segment-specific caution; leaves open optimal strategies for durable isolation.
Introduction Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), and high-power, short-duration (HP-SD) radiofrequency ablation has been reported to be effective. Since the depth of the myocardial scar created by HP-SD ablation can be shallower than that of conventional middle-power, middle-duration (MP-MD) ablation, which might be a partial limitation of HP-SD ablation, we investigated the differences between HP-SD and MP-MD ablation. Methods and Results A total of 158 patients who underwent lesion size index-guided PVI were enrolled. The first half of the consecutive patients (n=83) underwent MP-MD ablation, while the second half (n=75) underwent HP-SD ablation. The PVs on both sides were divided into six segments of anterior, posterior, roof, bottom, and on the anterior and posterior of the carina. The patient characteristics, procedure features, remnant and early reconnections (RERs) of PV conduction after initial PVI, and clinical outcome were compared between the groups. The procedure time was significantly longer in the MP-MD group than in the HP-SD group (176.9 ± 56.0min vs. 132.1 ± 45.9min, respectively, p<0.001). The rates of RER at the right anterior carina was significantly less frequent in the MP-MD group than in the HP-SD group (12.1% vs. 25.3%, respectively, P=0.04). The cumulative recurrence rate expressed in the Kaplan-Meier curve was comparable between the MP-MD and HP-SD groups. Conclusions Each method showed distinguished features. Combination use of MP-MD and HP-SD depending on the segment of the PV, especially the right PV anterior carina, may be reasonable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mase et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: