Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate the safety and efficacy of high-power short-duration (HP-SD) ablation compared to conventional ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Does high-power short-duration ablation improve first pass isolation rates and shorten radiofrequency application time compared to conventional ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does high-power short-duration ablation improve first pass isolation rates and shorten radiofrequency application time compared to conventional ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
High-power short-duration ablation improves first-pass pulmonary vein isolation rates and significantly reduces radiofrequency application and total procedure times compared to conventional settings in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Supports HP-SD ablation for PV isolation efficiency in AF; leaves open need for randomized outcome trials.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of high-power short-duration (HP-SD) ablation compared to conventional ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: We enrolled consecutive 158 drug-refractory symptomatic AF patients (119 males, mean age 63 ± 10 years) who had undergone first radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). PVI was performed using the conventional setting (20-35 W) in 73 patients (Conventional group) and using the HP-SD setting (45-50 W) in 85 patients (HP-SD group). The rate of first pass isolation, remaining gaps after circumferential ablation, dormant conduction, and the radiofrequency application time in each pulmonary vein (PV) were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The first pass isolation ratio was significantly higher in the HP-SD group than in the Conventional group (81% vs. 65%, P = 0.027) in the right PV, but did not differ in the left PV. The remaining gaps were fewer in the right superior PV (4% vs. 21%, P = 0.001) and left inferior PV (1% vs. 8%, P = 0.032) areas, and the radiofrequency application time in each PV was shorter (right PV, 12.0 ± 8.9 min vs. 34.0 ± 31.7 min, P < 0.001; left PV, 10.6 ± 3.6 min vs. 25.7 ± 22.3 min, P < 0.001) in the HP-SD group than in the Conventional group. CONCLUSION: The use of the HP-SD setting might contribute to improve the first pass isolation rate and to shorten the radiofrequency application time in each PV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hijioka et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: