Why the study?
HPSD settings for pulmonary vein isolation vary widely across centers, and studies measuring the acute effectiveness of various HPSD settings are limited.
Does high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation (50 W for 6-10 s) achieve durable acute pulmonary vein isolation in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation?
Does high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation (50 W for 6-10 s) achieve durable acute pulmonary vein isolation in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation?
While HPSD ablation (50 W for 6-10 s) shortens procedure time, it results in a high rate of acute dormant pulmonary vein conduction (32% of patients), suggesting suboptimal acute effectiveness.
BACKGROUND: Application of high power radiofrequency (RF) energy for a short duration (HPSD) to isolate pulmonary vein (PV) is an emerging technique. But power and duration settings are very different across different centers. Moreover, despite encouraging preclinical and clinical data, studies measuring acute effectiveness of various HPSD settings are limited. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) were treated with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using HPSD. PVI was performed with a contact force catheter (Thermocool SF Smart-Touch) and Carto 3 System. The following parameters were used: energy output 50 W, target temperature 43°C, irrigation 15 mL/min, targeted contact force of > 10 g. RF energy was applied for 6-10 s. Required minimal interlesion distance was 4 mm. Twenty minutes after each successful PVI adenosine provocation test (APT) was performed by administrating 18 mg adenosine to unmask dormant PV conduction. RESULTS: All PVs (100 PVs) were successfully isolated. RF lesions needed per patient were 131 ± 41, the average duration for each RF application was 8.1 ± 1.7 s. Procedure time was 138 ± 21 min and average of total RF energy duration was 16.3 ± 5.2 min and average amount of RF energy was 48209 ± 12808 W. APT application time after PVI was 31.1 ± 8.3 min for the left sided PVs and 22.2 ± 4.6 min (p = 0.005) for the right sided PVs. APT was transiently positive in 18 PVs (18%) in 8 (32%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary vein isolation with high power for 6-10 s is feasible and shortens the procedure and ablation duration. However, acute effectiveness of the HPSD seems to be lower than expected. Further studies combining other ablation parameters are needed to improve this promising technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Üçer et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: