Key result
Tafamidis 61 mg shows similar cardiovascular outcomes across age groups in ATTR-CM.
Why the study?
Elderly patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) remain underrepresented in clinical trials, prompting evaluation of tafamidis 61 mg effectiveness across different age groups.
Does the effectiveness of tafamidis 61 mg in reducing cardiovascular-related hospitalization and cardiovascular death differ across age groups (< 75, 75-85, and > 85 years) in patients with ATTR-CM?
Cohort (n=89)
Does the effectiveness of tafamidis 61 mg in reducing cardiovascular-related hospitalization and cardiovascular death differ across age groups (< 75, 75-85, and > 85 years) in patients with ATTR-CM?
Effect estimate: Log-Rank 5.71
p-value: p=0.06
Real-world data demonstrate that tafamidis 61 mg yields comparable rates of cardiovascular hospitalization and death across all age groups in ATTR-CM, with patients over 85 years experiencing greater reductions in NT-proBNP and diuretic requirements than those under 75.
INTRODUCTION: Elderly patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) remain underrepresented in clinical trials. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of tafamidis 61 mg in patients with ATTR-CM across different age groups. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with ATTR-CM treated with tafamidis 61 mg were stratified into age groups: < 75, 75-85, > 85 years. Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected at baseline and follow-up. The primary outcome - cardiovascular-related hospitalization and cardiovascular death - was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients with ATTR-CM were included: < 75 (n = 23), 75-85 (n = 40), and > 85 years (n = 26). Hereditary ATTR-CM was more prevalent in younger patients (p < 0.001). Older patients (≥ 75) were more often in NYHA class II/III (p = 0.009), required higher diuretic doses (p < 0.001), and had higher NT-proBNP (p = 0.002). At baseline, patients ≥ 75 years had greater maximal wall thickness (p < 0.001) and left ventricular mass (p = 0.034); global longitudinal strain was most impaired in those > 85 years (p = 0.039). Over a mean follow-up time of 27.4 ± 19.3 months, tafamidis treatment in patients > 85 years was associated with a greater reduction in NT-proBNP (p = 0.041) and in diuretic doses compared to those < 75 years (p = 0.044). No significant changes were observed in NYHA class, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores, or echocardiographic parameters. The composite outcome of cardiovascular-related hospitalization and cardiovascular death did not differ significantly among age groups (Log-Rank 5.71, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the benefits of tafamidis in elderly patients, including those aged > 85 years, and supports its use across all age groups to improve cardiovascular outcomes in ATTR-CM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gregório et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) (n=89). Tafamidis 61 mg across age groups (>85 and 75-85 years) vs. Younger age group (<75 years) was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular-related hospitalization and cardiovascular death (Log-Rank 5.71, p=0.06). Tafamidis 61 mg treatment in ATTR-CM showed no significant difference in cardiovascular hospitalization and death across age groups (<75, 75-85, >85 years; Log-Rank 5.71, p=0.06).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: