Key result
Eye state and temporal order significantly modulated cardiac activity, with higher heart rate and lower vagally mediated HRV during eyes-closed and second eyes-open sessions compared to the first.
Why the study?
Baseline cardiac autonomic regulation may vary based on eye state and physical activity, but standard baseline protocols lacked empirical evaluation.
Does eye state and physical activity affect cardiac autonomic regulation in university students?
Observational (n=100)
Does eye state and physical activity affect cardiac autonomic regulation in university students?
The fixed EO1-EC-EO2 protocol provides reliable baseline estimates for cardiac autonomic regulation, which is modulated by eye state and physical activity.
Eye-state effects warrant caution in autonomic baseline selection; leaves open optimal protocols for validation.
Selecting a valid baseline for measuring cardiac autonomic regulation is essential for psychophysiological research. Current guidelines typically recommend eyes-closed resting baselines, preceded by 5 min with eyes open. However, baseline autonomic regulation may vary as a function of both sensory-attentional state (i.e., eye state) and interindividual factors such as physical activity (PA). The present study examined differences between eye-states in autonomic regulation and respiration across a standardized baseline protocol (eyes open [EO1], eyes closed [EC], eyes open [EO2]) and investigated whether these responses are associated with habitual and leisure-time PA. In total, N = 100 university students were recorded during three consecutive 5-min sessions using electrocardiography and impedance cardiography (VU-AMS). Heart rate (HR), root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), high-frequency power (HF), and respiration rate (estimated via impedance cardiography) were examined. Physical activity was assessed via questionnaires. Mixed-effects models tested condition effects and PA associations, including interactions. Eye state and temporal order significantly modulated cardiac activity, with higher HR and lower vagally mediated HRV during EC and EO2 compared to EO1. Respiration rate differed between EC and subsequent EO2. Low- and moderate-intensity leisure-time PA showed negative associations with vagal indices and interacted with both eyes-open conditions to predict RMSSD. The fixed EO1-EC-EO2 protocol provides reliable baseline estimates consistent with the Vagal Tank Theory and Neurovisceral Integration Model. As the first empirical evaluation of this baseline sequence, the study advances HRV methodology, clarifies context-dependent PA-HRV relationships, and offers normative autonomic data that strengthen experimental and applied psychophysiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marschin et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Healthy university students (n=100). Standardized baseline protocol (eyes open, eyes closed, eyes open) was evaluated on Heart rate, RMSSD, high-frequency power, and respiration rate. Eye state and temporal order significantly modulated cardiac activity, with higher heart rate and lower vagally mediated HRV during eyes-closed and second eyes-open sessions compared to the first.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: