Key result
Increasing positive end-expiratory pressure from 0 to 15 cm H2O significantly varied right ventricular end-diastolic volume for individuals (p < 0.05) independently of filling pressure changes.
Why the study?
Does increasing positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) alter right ventricular function and volumes in patients after thoracotomy?
Population
12 patients after thoracotomy
Comparison
Positive end-expiratory pressure increased from… vs Baseline (PEEP zero)
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
Alerts to RV volume monitoring during PEEP titration post-thoracotomy; leaves open preload-independent mechanisms in larger cohorts.
Observational (n=12)
Does increasing positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) alter right ventricular function and volumes in patients after thoracotomy?
Increasing PEEP in post-thoracotomy patients alters RV volumes independently of filling pressures, likely due to RV shape changes dissociating EDV from wall stress.
Pinsky et al. (1992) conducted an observational in Post-thoracotomy (n=12). Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) vs. Baseline (PEEP of 0 cm H2O) was evaluated on Right ventricular volumes, pressures, and pericardial pressure. Increasing positive end-expiratory pressure from 0 to 15 cm H2O significantly varied right ventricular end-diastolic volume for individuals (p < 0.05) independently of filling pressure changes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: